Comments on: Looking at CMS, from viewpoint of SEO Part One http://www.blognamic.com/looking-at-cms-from-viewpoint-of-seo-part-one/ Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:50:51 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Home Design http://www.blognamic.com/looking-at-cms-from-viewpoint-of-seo-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-6449 Home Design Mon, 25 May 2009 18:24:19 +0000 http://www.derek-ang.com/?p=752#comment-6449 Just the page text changes. I use dreamweaver to lay the sites out and once completed, i'm looking to get a CMS in place so clients can update their own text. Just the page text changes. I use dreamweaver to lay the sites out and once completed, i’m looking to get a CMS in place so clients can update their own text.

]]> By: Trigun DVDs http://www.blognamic.com/looking-at-cms-from-viewpoint-of-seo-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5781 Trigun DVDs Thu, 05 Feb 2009 03:59:22 +0000 http://www.derek-ang.com/?p=752#comment-5781 I've developed at least 3 different CMS's for different reasons over the years as a PHP developer. Thus far I've learned two things. 1. writing your own CMS is fascinating, but kind of useless. 2. Use the best tool for each particular type of content you need to manage, and then syndicate content as needed. For example, Flickr is awesome for managing photos, Wordpress works awesome for blogging and text content, and YouTube is great for videos, so instead of writing a CMS for Photos, Blogging, and Video management, why not run the whole thing on WP and syndicate the photos and videos from the other services. It's a double bonus because you also get the exposure that the other communities bring and you don't have to worry about rolling your own system. Oh, and videos and photos hosted on flickr and youtube tend to rank higher than if they were self-hosted. I’ve developed at least 3 different CMS’s for different reasons over the years as a PHP developer. Thus far I’ve learned two things. 1. writing your own CMS is fascinating, but kind of useless. 2. Use the best tool for each particular type of content you need to manage, and then syndicate content as needed. For example, Flickr is awesome for managing photos, Wordpress works awesome for blogging and text content, and YouTube is great for videos, so instead of writing a CMS for Photos, Blogging, and Video management, why not run the whole thing on WP and syndicate the photos and videos from the other services. It’s a double bonus because you also get the exposure that the other communities bring and you don’t have to worry about rolling your own system.

Oh, and videos and photos hosted on flickr and youtube tend to rank higher than if they were self-hosted.

]]> By: positioning seo http://www.blognamic.com/looking-at-cms-from-viewpoint-of-seo-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5780 positioning seo Thu, 05 Feb 2009 02:25:44 +0000 http://www.derek-ang.com/?p=752#comment-5780 <strong>positioning seo...</strong> It sounds interesting but I am not sure that I agree with you completely.... positioning seo…

It sounds interesting but I am not sure that I agree with you completely….

]]> By: Find Niches http://www.blognamic.com/looking-at-cms-from-viewpoint-of-seo-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5761 Find Niches Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:02:46 +0000 http://www.derek-ang.com/?p=752#comment-5761 Glad I found this site - I'm finding the content very useful - thanks! Glad I found this site – I’m finding the content very useful – thanks!

]]>